Tag Archives: Mass Surveillance

Lyrics for a Surveillance Society – The Hacking Suite for Governmental Interception

Lyrics by Hacking Team. Music by Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and several United States agencies including the DEA, FBI and Department of Defense.

Criminals and terrorists rely on mobile phones, tablets, lap tops and computers equipped with universal end-to-end encryption to hide their activity. Their secret communications and encrypted files can be critical to investigating, preventing and prosecuting crime. Hacking Team provides law enforcement an effective, easy-to-use solution. Law enforcement and intelligence communities worldwide rely on Hacking Team in their mission to keep citizens safe. The job has never been more challenging or more important.

You have new challenges today

Sensitive data is transmitted over encrypted channels

Often the information you want is not transmitted at all

Your target may be outside your monitoring domain

Is passive monitoring enough?

You need more ….

You want to look through your target’s eyes

You have to hack your target

While your target is …. Browsing the web, Exchanging documents, Receiving SMS, Crossing the borders

You have to hit many different platforms – Windows, OS X, Linux, Android, iOS, Blackberry, Windows Phone, Symbian

You have to overcome encryption and capture relevant data – Skype & Voice Calls, Social Media, Target Location, Messaging, Relationship, Audio & Video

Being stealth and untraceable

Immune to protection systems

Hidden collection infrastructure

Deployed all over your country

Up to hundreds of thousands of targets

All managed from a single place

Exactly what we do

Remote Control System – Galileo – The Hacking Suite for Governmental Interception

Hacking Team – Rely On Us

ENDS

Using Stylometry DHS have id’d Bitcoin creator Nakamoto with help from NSA PRISM & MUSCULAR programs

Allegedly using word surveillance and stylometry the effort took less than a month. Apparently using encryption and complex obfuscation methods is not a defence when the “seeker” has access to trillions of writing samples from a billion or so people across the globe.

By taking Satoshi’s texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000 word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words. This would result in a unique 50-number identifier for each chunk. The NSA then placed each of these numbers into a 50-dimensional space and flatten them into a plane using principal components analysis. The result is a ‘fingerprint’ for anything written by Satoshi that could easily be compared to any other writing.

It is worth noting that the original post is littered with comments that request more details on the source of the information that informed the post or some other such proof of the veracity of the claims being made but the author declared in response:

Many readers have asked that I provide third party citations to ‘prove’ the NSA identified Satoshi using stylometry. Unfortunately, I cannot as I haven’t read this anywhere else — hence the reason I wrote this post. I’m not trying to convince the reader of anything, instead my goal is to share the information I received and make the reader aware of the possibility that the NSA can easily determine the authorship of any email through the use of their various sources, methods, and resources.

Many readers have asked who Satoshi is and I’ve made it clear that information wasn’t shared with me. Based on my conversation I got the impression (never confirmed) that he might have been more than one person. This made me think that perhaps the Obama administration was right that Bitcoin was created by a state actor. One person commented on this post that Satoshi was actually four people. Again, I have no idea.

If it is true then “The moral of the story? You can’t hide on the internet anymore. Your sentence structure and word use is MORE unique than your own fingerprint. If an organization, like the NSA, wants to find you [sic] they will.

Full story by Alexander Muse is on Medium.

ENDS

Quick Reference Resource: WikiLeaks CIA Vault7 Leak #20 – CouchPotato

CouchPotato enabled CIA agents to remotely use the tool to stealthily collect RTSP/H.264 video streams (RTSP/H.264: Real Time Streaming Protocol is a network control protocol designed for use in entertainment and communication systems and is a control mechanism for streaming media servers).

The tool provided CIA operatives with a number of options:

  • Collect the media stream as a video file (AVI);
  • Capture still images (JPG) of frames from the media stream;
    • This function was capable of being triggered only when there was change (threshold setting) in the pixel count from the previous capture;

The tool uses FFmpeg to encode and decode video and images and Real Time Streaming Protocol connectivity. The CouchPotato tool works stealthily without leaving any evidence on the attacked systems facilitated by ICE v3 “Fire and Collect” loader.

This is an in-memory code execution (ICE) technique that runs malicious code without the module code being written to the disk.

Neither Wikileaks, nor the leaked user guide explains how the agency penetrates the attacked systems, but as many CIA malware, exploits and hacking tools have already leaked in the Vault 7 publications, the agency has probably used CouchPotato in combination with other tools.” – TAD Group

The 10th August 2017 WikiLeaks release overview:

“Today, August 10th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes the the User Guide for the CoachPotato project of the CIA. CouchPotato is a remote tool for collection against RTSP/H.264 video streams. It provides the ability to collect either the stream as a video file (AVI) or capture still images (JPG) of frames from the stream that are of significant change from a previously captured frame. It utilizes ffmpeg for video and image encoding and decoding as well as RTSP connectivity. CouchPotato relies on being launched in an ICE v3 Fire and Collect compatible loader.”

One document was published alongside this release:

CouchPotato v1.0 — User Guide

Previous and subsequent Vault 7 WikiLeaks CIA document dump synopses are available via the Quick Reference Resource: WikiLeaks CIA Vault 7 Leaks

ENDS 

Quick Reference Resource: WikiLeaks CIA Vault7 Leak #18 – UCL / Raytheon

In November 2014, Raytheon announced its acquisition of Blackbird Technologies. This acquisition expanded Raytheon’s special operations capabilities in several areas including:

  • Tactical Intelligence
  • Surveillance and reconnaissance
  • Secure tactical communications
  • Cybersecurity

Raytheon stated that their existing capabilities were now augmented by the Blackbird Technologies acquisition “across a broad spectrum of globally dispersed platforms and communications networks”. Blackbird Technologies was synergistic with Raytheon’s existing expertise and capabilities specifically in the areas of:

  • Sensors
  • Communications
  • Command & Control

This document dump contains suggested PoC’s for malware attack vectors. Raytheon Blackbird Technologies acted as a “kind of “technology scout” for the Remote Development Branch (RDB) of the CIA”.

They analysed malware attacks in the public domain and then gave the CIA recommendations for malware projects. These suggestions by RBT to the CIA were in line with the agencies stated objectives. These malware recommendations benefitted from data derived from “test deployments” in the field by other malware actors. Weaknesses in legacy deployments were assessed and designed out in the CIA versions.

The 19th July 2017 WikiLeaks release overview:

Today, July 19th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the CIA contractor Raytheon Blackbird Technologies for the “UMBRAGE Component Library” (UCL) project. The documents were submitted to the CIA between November 21st, 2014 (just two weeks after Raytheon acquired Blackbird Technologies to build a Cyber Powerhouse) and September 11th, 2015. They mostly contain Proof-of-Concept ideas and assessments for malware attack vectors – partly based on public documents from security researchers and private enterprises in the computer security field. Raytheon Blackbird Technologies acted as a kind of “technology scout” for the Remote Development Branch (RDB) of the CIA by analysing malware attacks in the wild and giving recommendations to the CIA development teams for further investigation and PoC development for their own malware projects.

Forty One (41) documents accompanied this release:

  1. 11 September, 2015 (S//NF) CSIT 15083 — HTTPBrowser
  2. 11 September, 2015 (S//NF) CSIT 15085 — NfLog
  3. 11 September, 2015 (S//NF) Symantec — Regin – Stealthy Surveillance
  4. 11 September, 2015 (S//NF) FireEye — HammerToss – Stealthy Tactics
  5. 11 September, 2015 (S//NF) VB — Gamker
  6. 4 September, 2015 (S//NF) SentinelOne – Rombertik
  7. 4 September, 2015 (S//NF) FireEye – Window into Russian Cyber Ops
  8. 4 September, 2015 (S//NF) MalwareBytes — HanJuan Drops New Tinba
  9. 4 September, 2015 (S//NF) Cisco — Rombertik
  10. 4 September, 2015 (S//NF) RSA — Terracotta VPN
  11. 28 August, 2015 (S//NF) Dell SecureWorks — Sakula
  12. 28 August, 2015 (S//NF) CSIT 15078 — Skipper Implant
  13. 28 August, 2015 (S//NF) Symantec — Evolution of Ransomware
  14. 28 August, 2015 (S//NF) CSIT 15079 — Cozy Bear
  15. 28 August, 2015 (U) McAfee DLL Hijack — PoC Report
  16. 28 August, 2015 (U) HeapDestroy – DLL Rootkit — PoC Report
  17. 21 August, 2015 (S//NF) TW — WildNeutron
  18. 21 August, 2015 (S//NF) NMehta — Theories on Persistence
  19. 21 August, 2015 (S//NF) CERT-EU — Kerberos Golden Ticket
  20. 21 August, 2015 (S//NF) VB Dridex 2015 — Dridex
  21. 14 August, 2015 (S//NF) Symantec — Black Vine
  22. 14 August, 2015 (S//NF) CSIR 15005 — Stalker Panda
  23. 14 August, 2015 (S//NF) CSIT 15016 — Elirks RAT
  24. 14 August, 2015 (S//NF) Eset — Liberpy
  25. 14 August, 2015 (S//NF) Eset — Potao
  26. 7 August, 2015 (U) Sinowal Web Form Scraping — PoC Report
  27. 7 August, 2015 (S//NF) MIRcon — Something About WMI
  28. 7 August, 2015 (U) PoC Report — Anti-Debugging and Anti-Emulation
  29. 7 August, 2015 (S//NF) SY 2015 — Butterfly Attackers
  30. 7 August, 2015 (S//NF) Symantec — ZeroAccess Indepth
  31. 7 August, 2015 (S//NF) CI 2015 — PlugX 7.0
  32. 7 August, 2015 (U) Mimikatz Password Scanning Analysis — PoC Report
  33. 7 August, 2015 (S//NF) TrendMicro — Understanding WMI Malware
  34. 4 August, 2015 (S//NF) CanSecWest 2013 — DEP/ASLR Bypass Without ROP/JIT
  35. 26 June, 2015 (U) Software Restriction Policy: A/V Disable — PoC Report
  36. 26 June, 2015 (U) WMI Persistence Proof of Concept — Supplemental Report
  37. 29 May, 2015 (U) Mimikatz PoC Report
  38. 29 May, 2015 (U) Pony / Fareit PoC Report
  39. 26 January, 2015 (U) SIRIUS Pique Proof-of-Concept Delivery — User-Mode DKOM — Final PoC Report
  40. 29 December, 2014 (U) SIRIUS Pique Proof-of-Concept Delivery — Direct Kernel Object Manipulation (DKOM) — Interim PoC Report
  41. 21 November, 2014 (U) Direct Kernel Object Manipulasiton (DKOM) — Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Outline 21 November, 2014

Previous and subsequent Vault 7 WikiLeaks CIA document dump synopses are available via the Quick Reference Resource: WikiLeaks CIA Vault 7 Leaks

ENDS 

 

Quick Reference Resource: WikiLeaks CIA Vault7 Leak #19 – Dumbo

Dumbo is a capability to suspend processes utilizing webcams and corrupt any video recordings that could compromise a PAG deployment. The PAG (Physical Access Group) is a special branch within the CCI (Center for Cyber Intelligence); its task is to gain and exploit physical access to target computers in CIA field operations. *

Vault7 Projects - Images - AAC Dumbo - PAG

The 3rd August 2017 WikiLeaks release overview:

Today, August 3rd 2017 WikiLeaks publishes documents from the Dumbo project of the CIA. Dumbo is a capability to suspend processes utilizing webcams and corrupt any video recordings that could compromise a PAG deployment. The PAG (Physical Access Group) is a special branch within the CCI (Center for Cyber Intelligence); its task is to gain and exploit physical access to target computers in CIA field operations. Dumbo can identify, control and manipulate monitoring and detection systems on a target computer running the Microsoft Windows operating sytem. It identifies installed devices like webcams and microphones, either locally or connected by wireless (Bluetooth, WiFi) or wired networks. All processes related to the detected devices (usually recording, monitoring or detection of video/audio/network streams) are also identified and can be stopped by the operator. By deleting or manipulating recordings the operator is aided in creating fake or destroying actual evidence of the intrusion operation. Dumbo is run by the field agent directly from an USB stick; it requires administrator privileges to perform its task. It supports 32bit Windows XP, Windows Vista, and newer versions of Windows operating system. 64bit Windows XP, or Windows versions prior to XP are not supported.

Log Excerpt:

Vault7 Projects - Images - AAC Dumbo - LOG

Eight documents were also published alongside this release:

Dumbo v3.0 — Field Guide

Dumbo v3.0 — User Guide

Dumbo v2.0 — Field Guide

Dumbo v2.0 — User Guide

Dumbo v1.0 — TDR Briefing

Dumbo v1.0 — User Guide

Dumbo Epione v1.0 — TDR Briefing

Dumbo Epione v1.0 — User Guide

Previous and subsequent Vault 7 WikiLeaks CIA document dump synopses are available via the Quick Reference Resource: WikiLeaks CIA Vault 7 Leaks

ENDS 

The USA, Narcissistic Rage, A Sense of Entitlement & Holding Our Rights Hostage

The US is taking a giant shit on all of us, and our rights. And we are letting them. This is a nation that is currently led by extremists who inherited the job from a crazily compromised administration.

I previously wrote in All The Presidents’ Messes:

“In my lifetime the American people have elected Nixon (Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia), Ford (by accident), Carter (Iranian Revolution & Iran Hostage debacle), Reagan (Funded the Taliban / Iran-Contra Affair / Nicaragua / El Salvador / Guatemala), Bush the First (Gulf War I), Clinton (Somalia, Rwanda, Haiti / Israel-Palestine / Ethnic Wars in Europe – Croats, Serbs and Bosnian Muslims / Kosovo & Albania), Bush the Second (Iraq / Afghanistan), Obama (IRANDEAL, global appeasement, the relatively unopposed rise of ISIS, and the disintegration of Syria and Libya and Egypt as a result of US Foreign Policy failures) and now Trump.”

All US policy decisions and their side-effects, one way or the other, cascade down into our European democracies. In the current climate that should worry you.

Privacy Is An Absolute Right

I am interested in Privacy. The abuse of Privacy (1) has far more fundamental negative effects than might seem to be the case at first glance.

I am an advocate for the right of every citizen to a private life, the preservation of civil liberties, and the defence of other hard won rights. Technology or rather its unfettered deployment is the single biggest threat to our personal freedoms and by extension to the proper administration of justice.

And so I write about it. Sometimes the writing is a bit technical but most of the time it’s referencing the technical results of other peoples work to support my arguments (which I always acknowledge – most important that is)

Orwell 4.0

Technology facilitated developments have created new tools for the State, Law Enforcement, and Intelligence Agencies to monitor not just person’s of interest but everyone (2). Software industry greed and software developer naivety is also driving an assault on our personal privacy and security (3).

These phenomena have already resulted in wholesale abuses (4) of habeas corpus, an alteration of the perception of what constitutes a fair trial, have worn down the right to silence of a suspect, made the avoidance of self-incrimination almost impossible, made illegal searches and seizures (5) acceptable, and encroached on the ability of defendants to construct a proper defence.

Recently, Graham Cluley (@gcluley) posted a clarification of a definition on Twitter“It’s always bugged me how people say “Innocent until proven guilty”. It’s “Innocent *unless* proven guilty” folks.” – that is worth thinking about in an age of trial by media and JTC-as-a-Service (JTC – Jumping to Conclusions a.k.a Fake News).

In parallel with this there is an increasing trend of “ordinary” crimes being tried in “extra-ordinary” courts, tribunals, or military courts. The checks and balances that used to notionally counter the power of the state and where the actions of government could be publicly scrutinized has almost ceased to effectively exist.

Surveillance politics, the rise of extremists on the left and the right, religious fanaticism, the re-emergence of censorship and even actual talk of “blasphemy laws” in the parliaments of Western democracies leaves one bewildered. How will we fare when even newer technologies such as VRSN, and AI with even greater capacity to embed themselves in our lives begin to mature from the novel stage into the deployment stage?

What will be the effect of kinematic fingerprinting, emotion detection (6), psychographic profiling (7), and thought extraction (8) on the right to privacy and basic freedoms. These are questions and concerns that get lost in the rush to innovate. Software companies and developers have a responsibility but they do not exercise it very often.

What are the ethics? What are the acceptable limits? What are the unforeseen by-products?

The US Has Claimed “Absolute Privilege”

The US is the bully on the block and its “bitch” friends the UK (9), Canada, New Zealand (10), & Australia (11) just follow its lead or actively facilitate them.

The opacity of US laws (12) and SIGINT collection methods is an abuse of the rights of every defendant that comes in front of their Courts. Increasingly, that is just about anybody that they can lay their hands on, from anywhere (13).

The election of Trump just solidified my view that the world has turned upside down and it seems that taking action to reverse the trend of the normalisation of the abnormal (14) is a Sisyphean task and just seems to encourage the buggers (15).

The US position on most of these matters is ephemeral – not just on data protection (16) – and US national interest, national security, or just plain duplicity (17) governs their agenda.

There is so much abuse of power by the US that it is impossible to keep tabs. These things used to matter (18). These things used to enrage us (19). The US has led a race to the bottom on so many fronts that the rest of the world seems to be suffering from bad news fatigue (20) and has zoned out (21).

It is individuals and NGO’s now that are the gatekeepers of our rights and the ones that hold governments to account and increasingly they are being marginalized.

References

(1) Anonymous Chronic; 21st Nov 2016; NSA, GCHQ, The Five Eyes Handing Ireland Cyber-Security Opportunity; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(2) Anonymous Chronic; 21st Nov 2016; Mass Surveillance & The Oxford Comma Analogy; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(3) Anonymous Chronic; 21st Nov 2016; Software Industry Greed is Driving the Assault on our Privacy & Security; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(4) Kim Zetter; 26th Oct 2017; The Most Controversial Hacking Cases of the Past Decade; Wired

(5) Andy Greenberg; 10th Oct 2014; Judge Rejects Defense That FBI Illegally Hacked Silk Road – On A Technicality; Wired

(6) Anonymous Chronic; 3rd Jan 2017; Orwell 4.0: The Stealth Advance of Kinematic Fingerprinting & Emotion Detection for Mass Manipulation; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(7) Anonymous Chronic; 4th Feb 2017; Is Kosinski “Tesla” to Nix’s “Marconi” for Big Data Psychographic Profiling?;AirGap Anonymity Collective

(8) Ian Johnston; 18th Apr 2017; Device that can literally read your mind invented by scientists; Independent

(9) Anonymous Chronic; 30th Nov 2016; My Privacy Lobotomy or How I Learned to Stop Worrying & Love the IP Act; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(10) Anonymous Chronic; 3rd Nov 2016; Overwatch – The Five Eyes Espionage Alliance; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(11) Anonymous Chronic; 21st Nov 2016; Australia Is A Proxy War for the Five Eyes & Also Hogwarts; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(12) American Civil Liberties Union & Human Rights Watch; 21st Nov 2016; Joint letter to European Commission on EU-US Privacy Shield; Human Right Watch)

(13) Tom O’Connor; 6th Jul 2017; Russia Accuses US of Hunting and Kidnapping Its Citizens After Latest Arrests; Newsweek

(14) Anonymous Chronic; 29th Jan 2017; Take Action To Reverse The Present Trend Of The Normalisation of the Abnormal; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(15) Anonymous Chronic; 2nd Dec 2016; Silencing the Canary & The Key Powers & Reach of The IPA; AirGap Anonymity Collective

(16) Mary Carolan; 10th Mar 2017; Max Schrems claims US data privacy protections ‘ephemeral’; The Irish Times

(17) Shelley Moore Capito – United States Senator for West Virginia; 2nd Jul 2017; Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017; https://www.capito.senate.gov/

(18) Adam Taylor; 23rd Apr 2015; The U.S. keeps killing Americans in drone strikes, mostly by accident; The Washington Post

(19) HRW; 9th Dec 2014; USA and Torture: A History of Hypocrisy; Human Rights Watch

(20) Shannon Sexton; 30th Aug 2016; Five Ways to Avoid ‘Bad-News Fatigue’ and Stay Compassionately Engaged; Kripalu Center for Yoga & Health

(21) Susanne Babbel Ph.D.; 4th Jul 2012; Compassion Fatigue; Psychology Today

In Chamberlain-esque Pose EU Declares “Privacy in our Time”

The notional purpose of the EU-US Privacy Shield is to establish a framework that allows personal data for commercial purposes to be transferred between the European Union and the United States.

Personal data that is received by US companies operating in Europe is ostensibly governed by EU privacy laws. Pick any notable US organization and they have an office in Europe, typically serving the EMEA region.

But for the purposes of this rant suffice to say that we need only consider Google, Apple, Microsoft, Twitter, and Facebook (a.k.a “Farcebook”).

Do not buy into the high profile privacy battles that these organizations now raise high as examples of their commitment to their customers’ privacy. These are PR tactics.

All of these organizations were more than happy to be secretly willing accomplices to US intelligence agency antics and law-breaking before their activities were exposed and they suffered a backlash. They have been vigourously back-pedalling and papering over the cracks ever since. It is all meaningless posturing.

They are inherently compromised, every day, and in every way.

The EU-US Privacy Shield replaces what was called the International Safe Harbor Privacy Principles (ISHPP). Lofty names for a veneer that actually contains no verifiable substance or oversight when you examine the vast amount of exceptions and undermining laws that in fact render them all moot.

In late 2015 , the ISHPP was declared invalid in its entirety by the EU at a hearing in the European Court of Justice.

But like a smarmy salesperson, the US simply flicked the pages on the sales brochure asking “well, what about this?” – “no?” – “this?” – “no?” – “this?” – until some browbeaten Brussels technocrat bought the bullshit and agreed a new name for the same abuses.

In the usual garbled and meaningless language of the European Commission it was declared on 2nd February 2016 that the EU and the US had found new common ground on the privacy issue and an “Adequacy Decision” was published. (What exactly is an “Adequacy Decision” when it is at home eating chips and eavesdropping on its neighbours?)

In a Chamberlain-esque pose the EU held up this new agreement and declared that it was “…. equivalent to the protections offered by EU law.”

It is not.

ENDS

For more scholarly and considered thinking, read Joint letter to European Commission on EU-US Privacy Shield (July 26, 2017) from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International to the European Commission to urge a re-evaluation of its Implementing Decision 2016/1250 on the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield on the basis that the United States of America (United States) does not ensure a level of fundamental rights protection regarding the processing of personal data that is essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the European Union (EU).